Romanticised Modernism in Julie Taymor’s Across The Universe (2007) April 8, 2008
Posted by Richard Bolisay in Hollywood, Musical.5 comments
Directed by Julie Taymor
Cast: Jim Sturgess, Evan Rachel Wood, Joe Anderson
Julie Taymor’s Across The Universe is far from the extraterrestrial greatness of Lennon’s composition. But after the psychedelic vibe of compressing 34 songs into a film about love’s undying nature, a theme so often used I thought it doesn’t make sense anymore, I believe it manages to achieve more than half of my expectations; only the drawback is that while it seems to be harmless on the surface, it also tends to be forgettable. Towards the end when Bono sings “Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds,” I cannot remember anything from it that is strong enough to incite recognition.
Frankly, the main problem is its story. I love the concept, no doubt about it. Weaving a tale using the songs of The Beatles, whose compositions are definitely some of the most recognisable tunes in music history, and injecting modern touches of imagery and lyrical arrangements is absolutely wonderful. In fact I admire Taymor for being so ambitious with her craft, coming up with an avant-garde adaptation of a Shakespeare tragedy, bringing Frida Kahlo’s life into a dimension mixed with fantastical elements, and wrapping a romantic musical as sweet as a Wonka bar. Taymor deserves to be credited for her visual style, and the way she incorporates her background in puppetry and experimental theatre reflects her artistic vision as a filmmaker; and though sometimes her playful acts do not work, it shows her devotion to her craft, that she is doing things that she really likes. But fairness aside, her stories lack the punch – - they are beautiful to look at but memory keeps you from remembering what they are all about. Taymor seems to concentrate much on her images that she forgets to polish her narrative. While she exceptionally masters the fluid visual treatment of her films, satisfying enough to fill us in for two hours, the weakness of her plot stands out. And in Across The Universe, the idea greatly overpowers her characters, shrinking them into mere cardboard figures, their presence rarely felt.
The love story of Jude and Lucy doesn’t hold much on the viewer’s retention because it is too common. The heavy Beatles soundtrack is deliberately used to support the narrative but unfortunately it does all the talking and explaining; in a way, the music carries the film into a steep of heightened emotions but it’s just there, artificially introducing and closing each fragment of their lives in those epic backdrops. The brilliant arrangement of songs is impressive – - it might as well be credited as the film’s major accomplishment – - and both Jim Sturgess and Evan Rachel Wood have successfully played their part very well. Nevertheless, Taymor could have maximised the musical as a genre, given that she has talented actors and first-rate musical arrangers, if only she is able to stitch a great narrative out of the 34 songs that she handpicked, and does not rely so much on the songs, because undoubtedly any Beatles composition, if handled seriously, will always yield a uniquely positive outcome. Primarily, this is the problem with some of the musicals being released recently – - and also the reason why only a few musicals succeed; filmmakers tend to focus more on the genre’s selling point without polishing the basics; they forget that this is a film, not just an eye candy to tease the senses. Most of the time, the weakness of the script is easily emphasised by the overblown treatment and that’s when the oversight usually starts zooming out. Musical is a difficult genre and definitely one of the most difficult to pull off.
There are efforts to fuse the shaky, tumultuous life of the band that inspired the film: their final performance together on the Apple Building rooftop in London, the Lennon-McCartney ups and downs, the Ringo-look-alike Bono singing “I Am The Walrus” in what seems like a kaleidoscopic display of schizophrenia, with matching octagon glasses to complete the psychedelic fare, and glints of transcendental meditation in the “Across The Universe” segment, so funny for being too literal I almost nudged my seatmate after seeing the Hare Krishnas. There are moments of utter brilliance too – - that scene in the bowling alley while singing “I’ve Just Seen A Face,” Lucy’s brother Max (played marvelously by Joe Anderson) leading the group in “With A Little Help From My Friends,” and the absurdity of war in “I Want You (She’s So Heavy).” The choreographed sequences in “Come Together,” featuring Joe Cocker in different personas, the lavish underwater photography that continues from the group’s escapade in the fields in “Because,” and the idea behind those lovely strawberries tacked on the board, despite being blunt, in “Strawberry Fields Forever” are very commendable.
Undoubtedly, the 60s has always been great inspiration for writers to come up with stories that reflect the precarious life during that decade. In fact even Haruki Murakami has his share of stories in “A Folklore for My Generation: A Pre-History of Late-Stage Capitalism” in Blind Willow, Sleeping Woman which delves more on the emotional impact of the time to its people. As for myself, I always dream of being born and, of course, living in the 60s – - the spirited lives of Elvis Presley, Marilyn Monroe, and James Dean; the French New Wave; the filmmakers whom I revere making their most memorable films; the Beatles; the beatniks Ginsberg, Burroughs, and Kerouac; the rise and fall of Kennedy; the launch of spacecrafts and the battle between America and Russia; the pop and counterculture – - everything – - I could go on and on and mention everything that I wish I had during the era that I was born but were all in the 60s and eventually die reminiscing all the things that I didn’t have. All my knowledge of it were from the records passed to me by friends and relatives, films I learned from school, information I gained from books, and experiences I read from novels. Everything abstract. I’m not there. I am but a speck of forgotten memory. But one thing is for sure though: my heart and my soul will always be in the 60s. When no one is looking, I will slip out of this body and pull the plug. * * *
They Paint The Town Red in Tim Burton’s Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (2007) January 21, 2008
Posted by Richard Bolisay in Hollywood, Musical.10 comments
Directed by Tim Burton
Cast: Johnny Depp, Helena Bonham Carter, Alan Rickman, Timothy Spall
Based on Stephen Sondheim and Hugh Wheeler’s musical
In both forewords to Burton on Burton (the first and second revised editions), Johnny Depp fondly recalls the experiences he had upon meeting the filmmaker and his idiosyncrasies: that moment when he first saw him inside the café after receiving a call that he was being considered for Edward Scissorhands; that quicksand he felt when he was getting all the let-downs of involvement in TV productions; and several years after, when both of them already had their own children, who were now playmates, their pair continues to flourish, not only as personal buddies, but professionally as well — their six fruits of labor in the last seventeen years are just some of the strangest and enticing meals that we could get our tongues into. That Burton is someone that Depp would go to the ends of the earth for — tells us how far this grisly partnership would sail — and we’re certainly there to meet them.
Sweeney Todd’s subtitle could possibly be “There Will Be Blood” and I’m sure no one would dare object. Burton’s world will not be complete without blood — and darkness — which he mixes with masterly precision like a painter’s palette — creating beautiful strokes, striking imagery, horrifying abstractions, and grim display of colors. His venture to the musical shows how he enjoys taking chances — not only for himself but also for Depp, whose background in music is quite diverse, but not particularly in singing. Had he chosen a different actor, perhaps someone with cut-throat singing voice, then for sure it will fare disparately. Depp not only sings, he acts what he’s singing, he means what he’s saying, and he contorts his face like it’s the most beautiful sight in the world. Musicals are not only about singing — it’s the entire thing. And Depp proves that being an “iconic loner” that he is — that very man whose eccentricity is virtuously inexorable — is where he could fit himself perfectly — and with Burton beside him to realise his potential, I am sure there’s no way he could fail largely in his forthcoming projects.
Sure Leo, it’s not your fault. I almost doze off too — but the flame of the human furnace and the flesh coming out of the grinder are enough to keep me awake. The bent realities of musicals are quite foreign to my senses — I seem not to enjoy them as much as other genres do but this is no time for singling out; westerns could be extremely boring at times too, not to mention guns ‘n horses — but Stephen Sondheim’s songs are terribly terrific. And it’s likely to hear dozens of moviegoers who just left the theatre humming “Not While I’m Around” or “Johanna” or “Pretty Women.” Bear with them — the infection just spread. The most beautiful part for me is when Mrs. Lovett, in a beautiful scenery outside Fleet Street, tells Todd her fantasies, her dreams with him, where she would like to be with him, the prospect of a “happily ever after” — I gasped in awe — those are the few thaumaturgic moments in the film that reached their peak. And have you noticed Todd’s face? Priceless. When the film ends and Todd spills his blood to Lucy, I only thought of one thing which is not related at all to what I’m seeing: when I find time to have my beard shaved, if ever it grows long enough, I’ll make sure my barber won’t be singing. * * *
Middle-class Aneurysm in Jacques Demy’s Umbrellas of Cherbourg (1964) November 27, 2007
Posted by Richard Bolisay in Cine Europa, European Films, French Spring, Musical.4 comments
Original Title: Les Parapluies de Cherbourg
Directed by Jacques Demy
Cast: Catherine Deneuve, Nino Castelnuovo, Anne Vernon
It’s funny imagining a world where everyone sings what he wants to say, even the most mundane exchange of words, the trivial expressions of sanctitude, or life’s awful miseries. What if we speak our lines to the tune of different musicians every day? Today we have Philip Glass, tomorrow Mozart, the next week Liszt, next month Schubert, and so on; a mad world I foresee but how lovely! Having seen one, for an hour and a half in a setting that spans five war years, it is unmistakably hilarious.
I would lie if I say that I enjoyed this film. The Umbrellas of Cherbourg is certainly a classic, much to the hype of the supporters of this musical is perpetuating, but its timelessness is arguable. I must admit however that its crowning glory is Catherine Deneuve — her youthful flair that is very much impossible not to notice. Her inimitable career and rise to stardom deserves admiration, considering the overwhelming brilliance she had in her latter films: Repulsion, Belle de Jour, Tristana, The Last Metro, and even up to Dancer in the Dark. In this film, she shines effortlessly and radiates with oozing personality that it would be a sin just to forget her name. In a bleak, cloudless night, she twinkles — and we respond with admiration in return.
Must be the DVD copy in this year’s festival — I am expecting a blast both in my eyes and ears: the stunning credits sequence and Michel Legrand’s enchanting musical accompaniment. After a few minutes, I wish I have seen it at home instead, and if only I have the contact number of the French Embassy I would tell them to lend us the 35mm copy like what the Swedish Embassy did in Fanny and Alexander. But then — I’m calling myself a fool this time — it was them who lent Shangri-la the DVD.
On the other hand, what struck me most is the dialogue, particularly the conversation between Geneviève (Deneuve) and her mother (played by Anne Vernon). So it goes like this:
Madame Emery: Where were you?
Geneviève: With Guy.
Madame Emery: What were you doing?
Geneviève: Mother, he’s leaving. He’ll be away for two years. I can’t live without him. I’ll die.
Madame Emery: Stop crying. Look at me. People only die of love in movies.
Then afterward,
Geneviève: I’m pregnant, Mother.
Madame Emery: Pregnant by Guy? This is horrible! How is it possible?
Geneviève: Well, just like with everybody.
Madame Emery: Don’t joke. This is serious. What are we going to do?
Geneviève: What do you mean?
Madame Emery: What are we going to do with the child?
Geneviève: Raise it.
Madame Emery: What are we going to say?
Geneviève: To whom?
Madame Emery: Our friends, our neighbors!
Geneviève: We have no friends, and you never speak to the neighbors.
Madame Emery: And Roland Cassart is coming to dinner tonight!
Geneviève: You don’t need to tell him.
It was Luis Buñuel who mastered the craft of poking fun at the bourgeoisie — the middle-class who have nothing in their minds but status and how they look, what if I have my hair fixed? do I need to have my nails done? is that make-up you’re using much better than the one I have? and perhaps to them having the same clothes is the most awful thing in the world. Buñuel did it in such supreme jest I would want to be his disciple. In a particular scene, Madame Emery realizes that she has a huge debt to pay and exclaims to Geneviève, My God! We are ruined! What will we do? Should I have my hair done? Whether Demy is consciously attacking the mindset of his mother character — her reactionary behavior to be exact — it is done very subtly as if he condones it, and it adds a remarkable texture to the tenacity of his most popular work. The bourgeois culture exists side by side with criticism, which can be seen in various forms of art not only in cinema, and nevertheless the idea has remained universal — idiocy and idiosyncracy aside — that vested on them is a huge amount of social power and political influence; the only way to show them our remorse, for whatever reason that is, is have them ridiculed — the nastiest way we can — and it deems so effective that contemporary comedies harbor in satire, sarcasm, and predominantly, the jack-ass type of humor, and their audience is responding quite well. Closing this hallucination in accordance with the first sentence, whether it happens by incidence or otherwise, Buñuel directs Deneuve three years after in the tenaciously beautiful, Belle de Jour.
A carnival of love’s elusive nature — the effervescence of romance — rolls in manic fervor one can’t help but laugh on its sheer hilarity. Once you get used to the lines being sung, it’s easy to forget that Umbrellas of Cherbourg is a musical — beyond those solitary hues and falling graffiti, by a thousand miles, this is a comedy. * * *


