jump to navigation

To Siomai Love (Remton Siega Zuasola, 2009) October 28, 2009

Posted by Richard Bolisay in Asian Films, Cinemanila, Noypi, Short Cuts.
add a comment

to siomai love

Directed by Remton Siega Zuasola
Written by Dona Gimeno, Marvin Rubio, Remi Sola
Cast: Dona Gimeno, Marvin Rubio, Nathaniel Rubio, Gerard Piodos

Love knows no weather. It will barge into your door come hell or high water, even if the door is locked, or even if there is no door to begin with. Doors—we have a lot of them. We keep them locked, we keep them open, we keep them free for anyone to enter, we keep them ajar sometimes, but we always keep them where they are. We don’t want to change the location of our doors because we’re thinking someone might visit again—wishful, of course, but that’s how we are. Only a few bother to believe that love not only enters through doors. We have windows, dog doors, doorknob holes, peepholes everywhere. And the unexpected goes into one of them, To Siomai Love included. It’s like watching an eclipse, except that we don’t have the sun, the moon, and the earth. But three elements are still present: the two lovers and their newly found love. The lovers choose their role—be the moon, or be the earth. Love will always be the sun. The sun gives the two lovers the excitement to get to know each other, the rush of blood to their heart, the flow of words to their tongue. Considering that beautiful moment—when the couple talk and talk, talk and talk and talk, flirt and flirt, flirt and flirt and flirt, laugh and laugh, laugh and laugh and laugh—there are no other variables of failure, except chance. Or maybe human error. Or just plain assholeness. Or life. Departure has to happen. No numbers exchanged, just the gut feel of seeing each other again, trusting the sun, the moon, and the earth to meet again, to be pulled by gravity. But things happen—and things don’t. Wanting love is not even wrong; but not forcing it is not even right. The film bursts into melodic tune when it ends, Fran Healy singing “Take me, don’t leave me, Take me, don’t leave me,” only you hear it virtually, looping till the next short.

On Street Art and The Works of Italian Artist BLU October 5, 2009

Posted by Richard Bolisay in European Films, Short Cuts, Street Art.
1 comment so far

blu 7

A portion of the wall in Managua, Nicaragua

Words can’t fully express how much I appreciate Blu’s works. I have to shrill and make some childish noises as I look at them, and at times I utter string of incoherent phrases which I myself cannot believe came from my mouth. The mechanism of amazement, as always, innocently humiliates.

So I let my five-year-old niece watch Muto and I look at her as she watches it. She mutters “Angaleng!” countless times and in varying tones and loudness. Her eyes gleam as she exclaims her delight, never wanting to miss a frame by glancing at my direction. She watches first in silence, perhaps allowing the moving images to get into her senses, and after realizing the spark of creativity she’s seeing for the first time, she yells to me her own version of appreciation. After watching the film, she asks if she could see another one. I let her watch Combo and I look at how she reacts again. She is thrilled. This is our little bonding session before she goes to bed.

When she’s set to sleep I ask her what she thinks of the films I showed her. She seems to be pondering what to say but after a brief silence she tells me again, “Angaleng, Tito!” She must love the word. I insist for at least a five-word explanation, but I believe I am being too hard on her so I just let it go and bid her good night. Now I want to write something about Blu’s works, and to express it at least a notch higher than “Angaleng!” or “Gaaaaaarhhh” or “Anganda, Tito, isa pa.” I hope I can manage though, because even a bit of disservice is a shame.

blu 2

Prato, Italy

FRAGMENTS OF A MUSEUM IN THE CITY

There is not much information to find about Blu on the Internet, except that he is an Italian painter who recently became known in his street art. His graffiti works are marked by an incredible amount of talent and ambition, often breaking the literal and aesthetic boundaries of his canvas. Not only he makes the fullest use of the walls provided to him, he also makes them appear like fragments of a museum brought to the street for the locals to see. Aside from punctuating the value of street art in urban anthropology, Blu’s works also show that the limitations of art could also work at its advantage.

Exposure of works to the metropolis allows discussion on the subject of “consumption”, since the public has little choice not to see them. In the case of museums, one needs to pay, on his own volition, to view art works exhibited in galleries. Century-old questions like, Should art be free? or Does it matter if art is free? or Does it make an artist less of an artist when his works are out in the open? come up and become relevant.

Apparently, the importance of street art doesn’t stop at appreciating its aesthetics. It is also necessary to recognize its role in developing a community, particularly its members’ understanding and judgment of the arts, and the many ways it can challenge common beliefs and practices, as well as educate young and old minds alike, the same way more popular forms of visual arts are regarded.

But how about MMDA art, I ask, how does it make sense to you? Does it reflect our idea of art? Is it a collective concept that we agreed on or just a reflection of our political surroundings?

What makes street art extremely interesting for me is that a great number of people (it’s tempting to say most) look down on it. (Fair enough, some of them, particularly with the one I used above as an example, are based on good reasons.) A graffiti could be anything from the scribbles in the men’s room or the writings on the bleachers in school to the sprawl of histories and splash of emotions painted on the Berlin wall.

Some call it vandalism – - a crappy way to mess up the walls and leave them appallingly untidy – - and they respond to it like a crime committed to their society. I recall having seen a documentary in television about Filipino hobbyists who do street arts by commission. Since it is the head of the community who talked to them, by the time the work was finished, the residents were surprised when they saw it. The documentary eggs on the negative response, with some respondents going out of their way to call what the artists draw an act of visual terrorism. The commissioned street artists are into rap and hip-hop music, so perhaps that is where the prejudice hops from. Still, maybe even if they are not, the people wanted it to be erased.

blu 3

Barcelona, Spain

THE SPITTING IMAGE OF BLU IS HIS WORKS

One’s understanding of art is the spitting image of his intellectual and emotional ability to distinguish the good from the bad. And taste, which is more of an acquired property than an innate trait, is not something defended to be proven right. It stands on its own as a reflection of one’s mind, its breadth or its lack thereof, its predilections, and its lenience. I don’t think it’s necessary to argue with people who call a certain street art “terrorizing” but a contrary opinion is always welcome to hear, especially when it is well founded. It takes a consensus for a street art to be done, the community being a shared responsibility,  because the long-term effect of it goes beyond the “coolness” of seeing it everyday, or the repulsion one feels while looking at it. Balance and choice of location are important factors that the artist must also consider.

There is a particular painting Blu made in Barcelona that I liked, and since then I felt the need to take him seriously. It is a painting of a shark whose body is designed with paper bills. The use of bills makes it appear like the shark is moving, and its green color clearly points out his message. The video that records Blu painting the art is interesting for its conversations, especially the part when the kid mentions, “It shouldn’t be on a wall, it would be better on a billboard. Maybe I’d like it better if it were an ad.”

I find it striking for the insight, and the honesty and the keenness that the kid shows as he reacts with the art being done in front of him. Then an older man, perhaps his father, interrupts, “Look at Goya, Picasso, and Velasquez, all those abstract paintings that make no sense, and still people pay fortune for them.” And so I thought, would it hurt if we talk about something like that without people accusing us of highbrowism? I really believe that if we try to cultivate art appreciation at a young age, the way we look at ourselves and our country’s history would be different.

A short clip called Grottaglie shows Blu on a rooftop, painting a side of an apartment with red and white hues. The design brings to mind a sort of a mythic figure with a covering filled with holes. It records a day-to-night work, and the final shot reveals a view of the painting from afar, situating its location with the neighboring community.

Blu has done numerous works in Italy – - in Grottaglie, Modena, Prato, and Milan – - but he also travels his art with him. He has done paintings in Linares, London, Wroclaw, Eindhoven, Berlin, and a lot more cities, and has made collaborations with other artists as well. Pictures of these works can be viewed in his lovely website.

But talent, even if you are gifted enough to draw with your eyes closed, could not be everything. Blu is also very passionate and devoted to explore the possibilities of street painting. He makes use of wall corners and surfaces, from apartment windows and parking walls to granite doors and metal driveway entrance, to create a sense of movement in his outlines and a stunningly bizarre character in his design. From simple strokes and sketches to elaborate mix of colors and playful textures, he draws like the wall is an infinite universe.

Moreover, his works break the monotony of the city. He makes passing in sidewalks something to look forward to, something which cities in Metro Manila lack: the pleasure in everyday travel, from simple walks to public transportation. I imagine passing by these places just to look at them, to marvel at his figures, to dream of them when I go home, and to come back again the next day to look again.

blu 4

Muto: An Ambiguous Animation Painted On Public Walls
Animation and Editing by Blu
Assistant: Sibe
Music by Andra Martignoni

But he doesn’t stop at painting. He also creates animation pieces of his projects. His early sketches, from a transforming bulldozer to an exhaust fan that drives a man away, are remarkable in their deadpan humor. Most are only ten seconds long, and the humor is criminally strange. A more recent work called Morphing, which runs for less than a minute, shows a side of a warehouse painted with the signs and symbols of the Euro, the Dollar, the Swastika, and the Hammer and Sickle. He combines these things together to appear as if they are morphing, accompanied by a looping sound of a factory hiss. I find it peculiarly interesting when I notice that at the back of the warehouse is a construction site.

But it is upon seeing Muto when my admiration turns into fanaticism. Like his sketches, Blu morphs into an artist we haven’t seen before, and here he presents a fascinating succession of shapeshifting characters on his favorite world of walls. Painted in Buenos Aires and Baden in Argentina, Muto is memorable in its phantasm, primarily the fusion of visuals and music that creates a stunning fare of entertainment. From headless bodies and huge legs to hands that come out of nowhere and their reproduction of smaller and stranger figures, I am completely awed by the richness of its creativity and imagination. The floor and ceiling are also used, to my surprise and delight. The passing cars along the road can be seen and heard, evoking their participation in the film.

There are two important transitions that Blu has able to maximize in Muto. First, the transition among the figures. Since Muto basically depicts the transformation of one figure to another, the consistency of execution is crucial. It appears to me that while the execution is almost seamless, what holds the piece together is the element of surprise that Blu injects into the transformations, as well as the realization upon watching the painstaking effort it took him to deliver it. Watching the figures taking form unpredictably fast, birthing and devouring, shifting and dissolving, is a visual treat.

Second, the transition among the walls. From left to right and top to bottom, from brick wall to concrete wall, from wall to floor to a small corner to another wall and to the ceiling down to a wall, and from long shots to extreme close-ups, Blu makes a point of emphasizing movement. The wall not only breathes the character: it is the character. The little details you notice in its jumpy continuity only add to its playfulness. Blu is telling a story – - not just feelings, as far as the medium and style are concerned – - and through his transitions he has able to narrate a really tight one.

The images also stick to your mind: the walking pairs of hands and feet in the beginning, the running teeth, the perky diamond, the falling heads, the creepy bugs. But credit also goes to Andrea Martignoni for the ambiance. Her music renders these images elegantly, fittingly, and indescribably surreal without going overboard. The immediacy of the images goes hand in hand with the colorful texture of the music, their details evoking subtle hints on historic events. “Muto” in Italian means “mute,” but apparently Blu wants to make use of contradiction.

blu 5

Combo: A Collaborative Animation by Blu and David Ellis
Music by Roberto Lange
Made at Fame Festival 2009

While fractals dominate the imagery of Muto, Combo makes particular emphasis on structural space. The trademark figures are still there but Blu sets aside the design to pronounce the confinement. He goes around it, paints the ground, paints wall figures, connects them, makes coltish skits, and rolls with the fun of putting them all together. Whereas before, we have the idea that the wall belongs to the “real world” and the figures painted on it to the “unreal world”, Combo breaks that thought. Everything is on the same plane. Everything is on a parallel universe, effortlessly shown.

The concern on movement moves up, now providing a tangible coexistence of the realistic elements and the “non-realistic.” But the term “non-realistic” is not only insufficient but also not completely true. The paint, the bricks, the scraps of wood – - these are all real. But Blu and David Ellis use them as if they are not. The movement created out of them makes them appear unrealistic. The green laser, the dripping paint, the enormous feet, the wandering hand, they all seem to walk out of  the pages of Dave McKean’s illustrations or Svankmajer’s pad of sketches. To top it off, you get to watch the film twice. (By then, the question mark escapes out of our heads. What gives?)

blu 8

Modena, Italy

APRES-GARDE

The term “avant-garde” is used when describing works that break new ground in arts and culture. Blu’s works are innovative, cutting-edge, and progressive, so is it avant-garde? Absolutely. But with the misuse and overuse of the term in both mainstream and marginal communities I opted not to bring the word up to avoid hanging on the stereotype.

Creativity breaks borders. And perhaps that’s why expounding on Blu’s avant-gardism is needless, if not unimportant. What I find interesting are observations, the response towards his works, the interpretations made by people out of them, and the relevance of these images to their lives. The immediate reaction of my five-year-old niece is not different from the response of my fifty-something mom when I also showed the films to her. They both express their admiration, but only up to a certain extent. They think they are beautifully made and entertaining, but they can’t say why. (Or maybe they do know, they just don’t want to tell me.)

But really, is there more to it than that? Or should there be more to it than that? I don’t mind gibbering when I see a work as amazing as Muto. In fact, I do it most of the time, and I have always believed that the most beautiful films and the most thought-provoking ones (those that move you think to the point that you can’t think anymore) are the hardest to write about. Because really, when you write about it, you are bound to fail. The best review of Blu’s works is the smile you see from someone else’s face while watching them, which you wish you can put into words but you can’t, which you wish you can describe or share with other people but you just can’t. Ah, such pity.

Never mind. Blu needs more paint than reviews. To echo a comment, “For it takes strong shoulder muscles to push that much paint, long health to you, Blu!” And more paintings and animations to come.

* Blu’s website
** Blu’s Youtube site where you can watch his films

Isang Panawagan Sa Ating Mga Filmmaker October 1, 2009

Posted by Richard Bolisay in Short Cuts.
2 comments

delubyo 2

Imahen ng delubyo mula kay Wenzzo Pancho

Gusto ko lang po imungkahi sa paraang alam ko ang isang bagay. Dahil ito na rin ang industriyang kinabibilangan ko (o maaari rin nito akong itatwa ‘pag nagkataon), naisip kong napapanahon itong gawin.

Kung hindi mamasamain ng karamihan, kaakibat ng marami pang mas mahalagang bagay na dapat gawin matapos ang trahedya ni Ondoy, nananawagan ako sa ating mga filmmaker na gumawa ng pelikula. Iminumungkahi kong gawing paksa ang naganap na bagyo at ang idinulot nito sa mamamayang Filipino. Dahil ang kalakhang Maynila at karatig-bayan nito ang matinding nasalanta, inaasahan na ito ang magiging pangunahing lugar kung saan kayo tutungo. Subali’t hindi sana ito makapigil sa inyo upang tumungo sa iba pang pook, partikular na sa mga probinsiya na kung hindi man lubhang nasalanta ng bagyo ay maaaring pang salantahin ng paparating.

Noong 1990 ay tinamaan ng matinding lindol ang bansang Iran at halos 50,000 katao ang binawian ng buhay. Kung iisipin ninyo mas grabe ang bilang kumpara sa mga tinamaan ng bagyong Ondoy. Nguni’t hindi iyon ang isyu. Hindi ang bilang ng mga namatay o mga infrastrakturang nasira. Naging malaking pasakit hindi lamang ang pagsasaayos ng bansa kundi maging ang nasirang paniniwala ng mga tao, ang pagkawasak ng kanilang emosyonal na kapit sa isang magandang mundo. Tangan lamang ang pagnanais na makapagkuwento, binalikan ni Abbas Kiarostami ang Koker (isang nayon na lubhang nawasak ng lindol) upang kapanayamin ang mga tao at malaman ang kanilang saloobin. Doon nabuo ang “Where Is My Friend’s Home,” “And Life Goes On…,” at “Through The Olive Trees.” Ito ay mga simpleng naratibo na may malalim na pagsusuri sa sitwasyon ng Iran na pinagbubuklod ng nakaraan, kasalukuyan, at hinaharap, at ang malaking kaugnayan nito sa kanilang natatanging kultura.

Kinakailangan kayong mga filmmaker sa mga panahong ito, hindi upang isadula ang sinapit ng ating kababayan sa paraang sentimental, na bagamat makakatotohanan ay sapat na ang telebisyon upang iyon ay maipakita, kundi upang ipakita ang kahulugan ng pagiging Filipino sa mga sandaling ito. Inaasahan ding makapaglalaan kayo ng mas malalim na insight sa sitwasyon at hindi ang sapal-sa-mukhang pambubuska o pangangaral nang wala sa lugar. Pukulin ninyo ang kinauukulan – - sa paraang mahahalata man nila o hindi. Tingnan ninyo rin ang malawak na epekto ng sitwasyon at ang pinanggalingan nito at huwag hayaang mapigilan ng kakulangan sa gamit o tao. Higit pa, gawin ninyong priyoridad ang maliliit na kuwento, ang mga boses na hindi naririnig, at ang mga taong may makahulugang pananaw sa ating lipunan. Nawa’y makagawa kayo ng mga pelikulang hindi lamang sasalamin sa diwa ng ating lipi kundi magbabasag ng mga salaming iyon na madalas ay pumipigil sa ating gumawa ng mga bagay na nararapat.

The Perfect Human (Jørgen Leth, 1967) September 14, 2009

Posted by Richard Bolisay in European Films, Short Cuts.
add a comment

the perfect human

Danish Title: Det perfekte menneske
Directed by Jørgen Leth
Cast: Claus Nissen, Majken Algren Nielsen

Jørgen Leth introduces the perfect human by asking, “How does such a number function? What kind of thing is it?”

And he promises, “We will look into that, we will investigate that.”

The perfect human is represented by two people, a male and a female, each shown doing things as mundane as pulling a belt, applying some lipstick, zippering a shirt, clipping nails, or tying a shoelace. The narrator guides us to the parts of the perfect human’s face and body – - the ears, the knees, the foot, the eyes, and the mouth – - in a deliberate and exquisite use of zoom and closeup. As it continues, the description moves beyond the physical and goes mental. The perfect humans are in bed, naked. Then the male, as he shaves himself, starts to recount an experience. The two of them eat together, still with the voice guiding us, asking what is he thinking, describing to us what they eat, feeding us plain words, asking us questions that are simple yet the answers elude us.

The objective is objectivity.  Leth, the narrator, tries to distance himself from his subject to examine it more closely. It comes out as if the perfect human in scrutiny is a specimen in a petri dish waiting for a series of tests, with the narrator as the mad scientist noting the littlest detail of its movement, somewhat considering any observation as development. But despite being scientific in his approach, Leth also gives room to his penchant for metaphysics. He inquires, “How does he fall?” and he answers, “This is how he falls.” He asks again, “How does she lie down?” and he answers, “This is how she lies down. Like this.” His questions aren’t asked to be answered, but to be thought about profoundly, which reveals the nature of his objective. The perfect human is the property; he is smaller than he thinks he is; and as soon as he starts to think, he becomes the property of his thoughts.

When the narrator muses, “The room is boundless and radiant with light. It is an empty room. Here are no boundaries. Here is nothing,” is he merely describing the lack of scenery or has he turned into a poet building castles in the air? Is he presenting the perfect human as an anthropological experiment or is he using it as an excuse to reflect on life and existence? It is always both, the one functioning alongside the other, expressing both the concerns of the material and the immaterial, and without losing the grip on the language of film and the vast horizons of poetry, Leth makes use of the power of words and images to conjure the realm of lucid interval, each filled with uncanny insight and absolute ambiguity.

Basically the reason why The Perfect Human endures as a popular short film, and why it continues to be Leth’s career-defining work, is because it will always be relevant unless one ceases to be human. It is ambitious yet humble, succinct but complete, and worthy without crying out for importance. Its critics would always point their fingers to its shitty artiness and highbrowism – - but with its simplicity and a running time of 13 minutes that covers almost every boundary of pensiveness, how could that be but a blow to their credentials? How could they understand it by explaining it? (Which I did, unfortunately.) How could they hate it by contradicting themselves? How could words be enough?

Echoing Claus Nissen’s immortal words after seeing the film for the nth time: Today, too, I experienced something I hope to understand in a few days. (Or, as it seems to me, in a few years.)

Cinema Rehiyon: Alter Nativo (Films From The Other Philippines) February 16, 2009

Posted by Richard Bolisay in Asian Films, Festival, Indie Sine, Invitation, Noypi, Short Cuts.
1 comment so far

Text from the organizers

hunghong

Hunghong sa Yuta (Arnel Mardoquio)

Films from the Cordilleras to the Visayan Islands to Mindanao: Be ready for a film festival like no other.

“Cinema Rehiyon: Alter Nativo (Films From The Other Philippines)” is a non-competition film festival that will highlight the works of emerging filmmakers from the various towns, cities and provinces of the Philippines. For the first time, see what kind of films are being made the various cities and hubs outside of Metro Manila.

“Cinema Rehiyon” will be held at the CCP Dream Theatre from Feb. 18-21, 2009. It will feature short and full-length films made by regional filmmakers, set in their respective locales and done in their own dialects. Most of the works to be exhibited will be shown in Metro Manila for the very first time.

Bacolod, Baguio, Cagayan de Oro, Cebu, Davao, Iloilo and Naga are among some of the cities that will be representing their regions.

“Cinema Rehiyon” is a project of the National Commission for Culture and Arts in cooperation with the Cultural Center of the Philippines and the Crossing Negros Cultural Foundation. It is an official event of the Philippine International Arts Festival.

All screenings are for free and will start at 12 noon. For more details, inquire at cinemarehiyon@yahoo.com, or visit www.cinemarehiyon.multiply.com

imburnal-final1

Imburnal (Sherad Anthony Sanchez)

Program Schedule:

February 18, Wednesday
9:00 – 12 noon: Opening Ceremonies
1:00 – 2:30 pm: Yanggaw (Bacolod)
3:00 – 5:00 pm: Bacolod Short Films
5:30 – 9:00 pm: Imburnal (Davao)

February 19, Thursday
9:00 – 12 noon: Panel Discussions / Talks
1:00 – 2:30 pm: Cagayan de Oro Short Films
3:00 – 5:00 pm: Central and Western Mindanao Short Films
5:30 – 7:30 pm: Davao Short Films
8:00 – 10:00 pm: Hunghong sa Yuta (Davao)

February 20, Friday
9:00 – 12 noon: Panel Discussions / Talks
1:00 – 2:30 pm: Luzon Selection
3:00 – 5:00 pm: Baguio Short Films
5:30 – 7:30 pm: Bicol Short Films
8:00 – 10:00 pm: Brutus (Mindoro)

February 21, Saturday
9:00 – 12 noon: Panel Discussions / Talks
1:00 – 2:30 pm: Cebu Short Films
3:00 – 5:00 pm: Dagyang (Iloilo)
5:30 – 7:30 pm: Joy To The World (Iloilo)
8:00 – 10:00 pm: Closing Ceremonies

Binyag (Mariami Tanangco, 2002) January 19, 2009

Posted by Richard Bolisay in Asian Films, Cinemanila, Noypi, Short Cuts, UP Screening.
2 comments

binyag

Written and directed by Mariami Tanangco

Mariami Tanangco’s diploma film may have come out of unconscious transsexuality, but despite its brooding machismo, despite the various motifs that further emphasize the sordid logic of patriarchy whose primary concern is having the balls to overkill, despite relying heavily on stereotypes, Binyag sustains its hardboiled tenacity up to the sly end, no matter how conventional its attack to poke suspense through editing and harsh lighting, not to mention cunning actors who add to its claustrophobic wickedness. It inspires – - secretly, the struggle to just finish a thesis turns into a challenge to earn a best thesis – - as much as it satisfies. Bravery has now lost its meaning among young students’ works; it is not anymore a fitting word to describe such courage to raise issues hushed by apathy. The steady direction makes up for unnecessary experiments, the intrusion of slow-motion images that heightens the drama, pushing it out of normalcy to effectiveness. It is not a perfect film, but I am sure the late Jovenal Velasco was proud of this work.

Falling Integers in Kyle Canterbury’s Redefining Video (2006) October 7, 2008

Posted by Richard Bolisay in .MOV, Indie Sine, Short Cuts, Video Art.
add a comment

Video works by Kyle Canterbury

The avant-garde dilemma: claim it art, you’re pretentious; claim it trash, you’re ignorant. It surprises me how an entire novel of ideas can be built in an image, a flash of unmoving images, or a movement of flashing images as detailed by Fred Camper in his interpretation of Kyle Canterbury’s experimental pieces collectively called Redefining Video. Squirming grains like wiggling worms in a thousand flickers of blinding grey light, patches of indistinct figures in a faint strobe of computer monitors, geometries glowing in gloom then metamorphosing into acute polyhedrons of diffused anger, plummeting pixels and patterns of puddles and Dubya Bush in castrating ocular madness, dark spots forming glandular fickle shadows of unknown origin recklessly dissolving into subterrania, branches of trees and swaying leaves over prehistoric architectural masonry (that’s what it looks like) and houses replete with polite mix of prodding silence and drab existence  – - all seem nonsense to me, but then nincompoopery is a handsome trait. Gazillion possibilities in video, even our MMDA has its own display of mockery, and whoever claims to anything these days? Words do not own us; we own them. The amiable access to video turns a nobody into a peabody; Canterbury’s hip and critic-friendly works know no boundaries – - it is an imposing subliminal torture to sit through a succession of his works but he can go on and on and on and on to examine the varying textures of his chosen medium and still come up with the same proof: an iconoclast never stops, he just keeps on destroying.

*3rd .MOV International Digital Film Festival, Bacolod, Dumaguete, Iloilo, Manila (Robinson’s Galleria), September 20 – October 7, 2008.

Blind the Eye of the Storm: .MOV Signals Three! September 12, 2008

Posted by Richard Bolisay in Asian Films, European Films, Festival, Indie Sine, Invitation, Noypi, Short Cuts.
5 comments

Text by Khavn DELA CRUZ

Chantal Akerman’s Là-Bas (Down There, 2006)

.MOV (pronounced “dot-mov”), the first digital filmfest in the Philippines which jumpstarted the digital revolution in the country back in 2002, will have its third edition in Robinsons Galleria Cinema from September 30 to October 7, 2008. The Opening Night will be on September 30, Tuesday, and the Closing & Awards Night will be on October 4, Saturday. Parallel screenings in the cities of Bacolod , Dumaguete, and Iloilo will be held from September 24 to October 7.

The 3rd .MOV International Digital Film Festival, headed by Festival Director Khavn De La Cruz has six major sections consisting of foreign and local full-length and short films, tributes, workshops, film concerts, and afterparties. The motto for this year’s festival is “Blind The Eye Of The Storm” – - losing sight of the limits and controls that plague cinema, so that we can stare at our infinite possibilities as a culture.

DIGITAL DEKALOGO 10X10 .MOV presents ten of the best foreign digital full-length films from the past 3 years.

1 “A Walk Into The Sea: Danny Williams And The Warhol Factory” by Esther B. Robinson (USA , 2007)
2 “Re-Defining Video” by Kyle Canterbury (USA , 2007)
3 “Days Of The Turquoise Sky” (Kurus) by Woo Ming Jin (Malaysia , 2008)
4 “Cinnamon” by Kevin Everson (USA , 2006)
5 “Head Trauma” by Lance Weiler (USA , 2007)
6 “En La Cama” by Matias Bize (Chile , 2005)
7 “Yo” by Rafa Cortes (Barcelona , 2007)
8 “La-bas” (Over There) by Chantal Akerman (France/Belgium, 2006)
9 “The Sun and Moon” by Stephen Dwoskin (USA/UK, 2008)
10 “A Prima Vista” by Michael Pilz (Austria , 2008)

This will be presented by ten of the best local filmmakers who have pushed the boundaries of cinema in their own unique ways: Ato Bautista, Jeffrey Jeturian, Jim Libiran, Auraeus Solito, Adolf Alix, Raya Martin, Sherad Anthony Sanchez, Ditsi Carolino, Manny Montelibano, & John Torres .

Antoinette Jadaone’s Saling Pusa (2006)

SHORTS.MOV features works from the two most prestigious short film festivals in the world: shortfilms from Clermont-Ferrand (France) and music videos from Oberhausen (Germany). The 3rd SILVERSHORTS Shortfilm Competition presents the new Philippine filmmakers to watch out for – - the twenty finalists from both the student and open divisions.

TRIBUTE.MOV premieres the new films and presents the early works of local digital indie heroes: Kidlat Tahimik, Roxlee, & Lav Diaz. Roxlee’s graphic novel “Planet Of The Noses,” Kidlat Tahimik’s DVD “Perfumed Nightmare,” and Lav Diaz’s soundtrack CD “Impiyerno” will also be launched.

WORKSHOP.MOV offers Rotterdam International Film Festival programmer Gertjan Zuilhof (“Celebrating the End of Cinema”), Slovenian film critic Nika Bohinc, Kidlat Tahimik (“Sariling Duende”), Roxlee (“Digital Animation”), and Lav Diaz (“Coffee Q&A”). The workshops will be complemented by equally inspiring facilitators such as Quark Henares, Tado Jimenez, Alexis Tioseco, Ramon Bautista, and Erwin Romulo.

Pedicab

FILMCONCERT.MOV screens Pinoy classics by Manuel Conde, Gerardo De Leon, Jose Climaco, and Carlos Vander Tolosa accompanied with new live soundtracks by Pedicab, Queso, The Brockas, & Radioactive Sago Project.

AFTERPARTY.MOV ends each night with a bang at the indie-place-to-be Cubao X, courtesy of music and entertainment from top notch events, media organizations and talent management groups.

For group screenings, workshops, tickets and other related inquiries and information, contact dotmov@gmail.com, bien@bannedmoviespilipinas.com, and visit www.movfest.com.

The 3rd .MOV International Digital Film Festival is presented by Filmless Films in cooperation with Robinsons Movieworld, Geiser Maclang Communications, Inc., Parco, Swiftsure Group, Inc., Click the City, and Brown Monkeys.

Lilok Pelikula is far, far away. May 8, 2008

Posted by Richard Bolisay in Short Cuts.
5 comments

Well, this is a bit sad. I never expected that Lilok Pelikula would be saying goodbye this early, a blogging career so short-lived perhaps only a few would remember that it existed. The past seven months had been really gruesome, with thesis work, day job, and some rough family issues, and this film journal, as well as Digital Buryong, had helped me a lot in releasing those stress and frustration, and directing all of them to writing.

Reading has always been my passion, but writing is something that I only discovered lately when I found a work as a web content writer for an outsourcing company in Ortigas. The job was short-lived too – - I only stayed there for two months – - but getting along with people who earn their living through words and imagination, I believe it made me realize what I really want to do in my life.

I wish to express my sincerest gratitude to everyone who visited this site, everyday, weekly, occasionally, once in a blue moon, whenever, and to those who took their time to write comments, again, thank you very much. Now that Philippine cinema is alive and kicking, let’s get those tools and help it build history. I am deeply optimistic that our filmmakers will produce better films this year, or next year, or several years from now. Of course not everyone of them is good, possible that most of them are bad, and only a few are exceptional, but the diversity among our films is something that we should be grateful about. Judy Ann Santos shooting a film in Palawan is something new. Raya Martin in Director’s Fortnight is something new. And Brillante Mendoza in competition in the Cannes Film Festival is not only something new, it rarely happens. So raise those beers and cheers to Philippine cinema, and hopefully our film criticism too will flourish.

(Richard Bolisay is just away and will be inactive for a while. This is just him in a state of disastrous sentimentality. He’ll be posting reviews when he finds time, but not as often as before. Morsels of his mind are all over the place and he can’t find where the other pieces are. Right now, he is waiting for divine intervention.)

A Short Note to Festival Organisers February 11, 2008

Posted by Richard Bolisay in Essay, Indie Sine, Noypi, Short Cuts, UP Screening.
add a comment

batang-westside-final.jpg

While writing my review of Nuri Bilge Ceylan’s Climates, I’ve come across the site of the 4th Boston Turkish Film Festival which features the Ten Best Turkish Films of all time. The films included were based on a poll conducted by the Ankara Cinema Association, the group who organises Festival On Wheels in Turkey and visits 4-6 cities every year to present the best of world cinema. The selection ranges from Metin Erksan’s Golden Bear-winning Susuz Yaz (1964) upto Ceylan’s Uzak (2002), which in turn gave Turkey its second Cannes Film Festival win after Serif Goren’s Yol (1982). It prompts me to thinking: why can’t we do it here? Why can’t we launch our film festivals that include the best of Philippine cinema?

The line-up of Cinemalaya includes films both in competition and exhibition. To be honest, the films in exhibition are the ones that I look forward to attending. Same goes with Cinemanila, though in the last few years, my interest dwindled due to its faulty scheduling and choice of theatre screenings. I wonder what happened to Pelikula at Lipunan. Is it still existing?

Whether we do it every year or not, until our audience gets nauseated by too much greatness or until we are suffocated by too much Brocka and Bernal that we produce different lists every year, then it is better than having nothing at all.

Which films to include is not an issue: Noel Vera already has his own, which I believe he won’t mind if we follow, and Gawad Urian also has its own selection of best films for each decade. The important thing here is that we have films to see and we have films to argue about. How could we talk about a film if we haven’t seen it? I understand how horrible some of our old film copies are, how they are eaten up by molds and how badly our equipment project them, but do we have a choice? Could we request for budget allocation? Could we ask for the opposite of euthanasia? I am sure that we, Filipinos, have high tolerance to these things. I remember seeing Nunal sa Tubig in a really dreadful copy in UP, but I sat through and finished the film, only to realise that I did not understand it. Again, something is better than nothing.

It is enlightening to discuss what constitutes a great Filipino film after we’ve seen it. Various factors such as timelessness, narrative, and treatment can be easily analysed if we have venues for screening and discussion, which at present Mogwai does. The large-scale nature of Cinemanila, Cinemalaya, and Cinema One Originals can largely help in developing and, later on, establishing our own national cinema. These festivals are only held once a year so people who are really interested will do everything to catch screenings they like. I remember I almost got hit by a speeding ten-wheeler to watch Endo, but I missed it. (I was able to see it the next day though) The flexibility of schedules, the quality of audio-visual equipment, and the efficiency of festival management are the things we need to crown these efforts with success. And if ever this idea pushes through, not only we can increase awareness and following of classic local films, not to mention honest appreciation of these works, we can also achieve a healthy environment for criticism. We do our part, you do yours. Everything follows.